The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + UltraViolet Digital Copy Combo Pack)
Evangeline Lilly is most beneficial known for her part as Kate in "Lost," but she's had film roles in "Real Steel" and "The Hurt Locker. Fans from the book can get the same relatively faithful adaptation with this much-loved book. Now "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" is one kind of several movies coming out right now which is at least two plus a half hours long. Directed by: Peter Jackson Screenplay by: Fran Walsh, Philipa Boyens, Peter Jackson, and Guillermo del Toro Based for the novel "The Hobbit" by: J R R Tolkien Cinematography by: Andrew Lesnie Original Music by: Howard Shore. The reputation with the "Lord from the Rings" trilogy sets expectations high for this film; Peter Jackson is returning as director, and Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens are returning as writers in addition to writer and director Guillermo del Toro.
Costume Designers' Guild: Excellence in Fantasy Film. "An Unexpected Journey" is exceedingly slow for your first 45 minutes possibly even, particularly if you need to sit with the dwarves eating every one of Bilbo's food, throwing plates around, belching, smoking, and singing. A couple wore grim reaper outfits and organized signs like "3 horses died with this film. " Jackson is unfettered and will do pretty much whatever he wants, if that means he really wants to put a character with bird poop on his head riding a bunny sleigh, then by golly it is exactly what he's gonna do. ) - 3 nominations: Makeup and Hair Production Design Visual Effects.
As a very anticipated Tolkien-fueled fare, it delivers some moments of both brilliance and boredom. One Sunday afternoon, my parents held certainly one of their late Sunday afternoon entertainments. Blu-ray 3D Combo Pack (includes Blu-ray 2D+3D, DVD and Ultra - Violet Digital Copy) - $24. This 2012 offering works being a sort of prequel that tastefully provides answers and clarity to your number of issues and concerns originating in the historical "The Lord from the Rings Trilogy. Akansha mittal is a web enthusiast and blogger who likes to write about latest English Movies, Movies, Hollywood Movies 2012.
It helps make the audience hungry for your next within the series -- at the expense of deciding on a framework and storytelling path which doesn't really go that far. "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" is often a fantasy adventure. " Jackson succeeds in setting up the best mood and tone for it. It reminded me of an cheesy Ray Harryhausen 'Clash with the Titans' type special effect. Bilbo gets separated through the group and interacts with Gollum.
Although it will take some coaxing, Bilbo eventually agrees in good faith, and out of an sense of empathy toward the dwarves. In particular, one battle scene of stone giants flinging huge boulders at one another was unnecessary. " "The Hobbit" has been filmed in New Zealand, which can be where the main trilogy was filmed. Call Jodi or Matty to go over trips to New Zealand or to request a free of charge brochure on 800. He becomes, however, more inspired the less he's directly associated with all the heaviness of the ring, his "precious," because he engages in a battle of wits with Bilbo.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey Reviews
This movie is FREAKING AMAZING!!! I was getting really worried before going to see it because of some negative reviews, but there is nothing to be worried about. If you loved the Lord in the Rings movies, specially the extended editions, you'll love The Hobbit too!
A small bit about me: I spent my youth on the animated movies, see the books when I was in sixth grade, and also have reread them repeatedly over the years. I'm a HUGE fan, but not a "purist", and saw each from the live action films repeatedly in the theaters. I took a class on Tolkien while attending college (and knew more to do with the books than perhaps the teacher lol), attended view the original manuscripts at Marquette University in Milwaukee twice, and borrowed most with the History of Middle Earth books in the library but just skimmed them. I'm pretty familiar with much with the appendices/deleted chapters/abandoned attempts at revising The Hobbit and sequelizing Lord of the Rings, etc.
I've been looking forward to The Hobbit since 2003, and have been following production online. When it had been announced 5 months ago that Peter Jackson was splitting the tale into 3 films (after already completing production around the 2-film adaptation), my heart sank. It's not that I was against turning The Hobbit into a trilogy (despite that it's intended as a children's story rather than an epic), but I just didn't think there was clearly enough story and yes it seemed like a cash grab that would probably destroy the pacing. But, Peter Jackson hasn't allow me to down before and so I held out hope. In fact the harder I heard him discuss giving the dwarves much more character development and backstory and adding in all the stuff in regards to the White Council, I began to check forward to it.
When 2-3 weeks ago reviews starting being released saying that, as I had first feared, the movie dragged as well as the pacing was terrible, I prepared myself for disappointment. Even though hardcore fans on messageboards like theonering.net who had seen the movie early kept saying it had been terrific, the negative reviews from professional critics kept being released. The movie is "bloated" and "dull" and "misses the point", the trainer told us. And so I was VERY nervous going to see the movie today.
I'm very happy to say that not just is the movie incredible, yet it's on par with all the Lord in the Rings movies. I haven't felt this way about a movie since Fellowship of the Ring a decade ago. I haven't had the opportunity to stop thinking about it all night, and I can't wait till I can visit it again. I sat inside theater for nearly three hours while using biggest grin in my face the whole time. The movie didn't feel bloated or stretched thin if you ask me. I was worried that there could be all these scenes that continued too long or belonged around the cutting room floor, but I can't think of anything I would have gone out. It was like watching the novel acted out for the screen facing me with fantastic acting, music, and production values.
The cinematography has really improved inside the last a decade! Wow this movie is beautifully shot! Howard Shore's music is again great, though there are several little deletions and changes through the Original Soundtrack -- alone that really bugged me though was the use with the Nazgul theme over Thorin fighting Azog. There was better music there inside Original Soundtrack and changing it absolutely was a horrible decision.
I love a further stuff with all the White Council/Necromancer. It's all there in Tolkien's appendices as well as in "Unfinished Tales", and (blasphemy for saying so) depending on how this is constantly on the play out on the next two movies I may turn out liking this better still than the ebook! Either the following film or perhaps the one after that will have the Battle of Dol Goldur and, from what I've heard, we will see Gandalf, Saruman, Radagast, and Galadriel battling werewolves and giant spiders as they try to drive your Necromancer. I can consider how awesome that'll be if Peter Jackson pulls them back!
And, yes, this felt if you ask me like a complete movie. One with the reasons I originally hated the concept of a trilogy was I expected to feel short changed by only going to a small fraction from the story then having to wait another year. But I felt like there were plenty of story and so they got into a lot of adventures.
My only nitpicks are few: I liked the design in the Great Goblin but I thought he acted much too cartoony. My other will there be were a couple of times where Bilbo as well as the dwarves fell from your height of like 500 feet and simply got back up. They would have been killed. I also thought the type Azog was fine, but why did he must be all CGI? Why couldn't it happen to be an actor in makeup like Lurtz in Fellowship with the Ring? Those are very my only nitpicks though.
As I sat in the theater I had a sense like this is one from the best filmgoing experiences I've ever had. I had the identical feeling watching Lord in the Rings. As someone who originally hated the concept of making this into a trilogy, now I say grow it on!!!
UPDATE: I got to determine the movie in 48 frames per second (HFR 3D) yesterday. I had only seen it in regular 24fps 3D before. 24fps may be the standard for film considering that the Silent movie days. The Hobbit could be the first movie being shot at 48fps allow it a sharper look. Unfortunately the technology is totally new so only some theaters are equipped to even show it at 48fps. Many from the reviewers were saying they hated it, it looks like a BBC TV movie. I was still curious allow it a try as it would be new technology and yes it's how Peter Jackson intended you to find out the movie, but I didn't would like it to distract from my first viewing if I ended up not liking it, and we all saw the movie first at 24fps 3D.
Anyway, I liked it and I didn't think it looked "cheap" or as being a "soap opera" in any way. It looked really sharp there were certain parts where the people appeared as if they were really right before you. In addition to that, motion blur is totally gone now and I've have been told by other people who get headaches from watching 3D movies that these were fine watching this, due to the 48fps.
Peter Jackson has confirmed that there WILL be a prolonged edition dvd/blu ray like they did while using Lord from the Rings movies. So you may desire to hold out from buying the theatrical dvd as it pertains out and get the extended edition.
This movie is FREAKING AMAZING!!! I was getting really worried prior to going to see it due to some negative reviews, there is however nothing to be worried about. If you loved the Lord with the Rings movies, particularly the extended editions, then you'll love The Hobbit too!
A little bit about me: I was raised on the animated movies, see the books when I is at sixth grade, and possess reread them more than once over the years. I'm a HUGE fan, however, not a "purist", and saw each of the live action films repeatedly in the theaters. I took a class on Tolkien while attending college (and knew much more about the books than the teacher lol), went along to view the original manuscripts at Marquette University in Milwaukee twice, and borrowed most from the History of Middle Earth books from your library but merely skimmed them. I'm pretty knowledgeable about much from the appendices/deleted chapters/abandoned attempts at revising The Hobbit and sequelizing Lord in the Rings, etc.
I've been waiting for The Hobbit since 2003, and still have been pursuing the production online. When it turned out announced 5 months ago that Peter Jackson was splitting the storyline into 3 films (after already completing production about the 2-film adaptation), my heart sank. It's not that I was opposed to turning The Hobbit right into a trilogy (despite that it's intended as a children's story instead of an epic), but I just didn't think there was clearly enough story plus it seemed being a cash grab that might probably destroy the pacing. But, Peter Jackson hasn't permit me to down before and so I held out hope. In fact greater I heard him mention giving the dwarves much more character development and backstory and adding all the stuff concerning the White Council, I began to appear forward to it.
When 2-3 weeks ago reviews starting being released saying that, as I had first feared, the movie dragged as well as the pacing was terrible, I prepared myself for disappointment. Even though hardcore fans on messageboards like theonering.net who had seen the movie early kept saying it was terrific, the negative reviews from professional critics kept to arrive. The movie is "bloated" and "dull" and "misses the point", i was told that. And so I was VERY nervous going to determine the movie today.
I'm very happy to say that not just is the movie incredible, but it is on par with all the Lord of the Rings movies. I haven't felt in this way about a movie since Fellowship with the Ring ten years ago. I haven't had the oppertunity to stop thinking about it all night, and I can't wait till I can visit it again. I sat inside the theater for up to three hours with all the biggest grin on my small face the whole time. The movie didn't feel bloated or stretched thin in my opinion. I was worried that there could be all these scenes that took too long or belonged for the cutting room floor, but I can't think about anything I would have left out. It was like watching the ebook acted out around the screen facing me with fantastic acting, music, and production values.
The cinematography has really improved in the last a decade! Wow this movie is beautifully shot! Howard Shore's music is once more great, though there are many little deletions and changes in the Original Soundtrack -- the only one that really bugged me though was the use with the Nazgul theme over Thorin fighting Azog. There was better music there in the Original Soundtrack and changing it absolutely was a horrible decision.
I love an added stuff with all the White Council/Necromancer. It's all there in Tolkien's appendices along with "Unfinished Tales", and (blasphemy for saying so) depending on how this is constantly on the play out within the next two movies I may wind up liking this better still than the ebook! Either the subsequent film or even the one next will have the Battle of Dol Goldur and, from what I've heard, we will see Gandalf, Saruman, Radagast, and Galadriel battling werewolves and giant spiders as they try to drive your Necromancer. I can just think about how awesome which will be if Peter Jackson pulls them back!
And, yes, this felt in my experience like a complete movie. One of the reasons I originally hated thinking about a trilogy was I expected to feel short changed by only seeing a small fraction from the story then having to wait another year. But I felt like there was clearly plenty of story and so they got into a good amount of adventures.
My only nitpicks are few: I liked the design of the Great Goblin but I thought he acted much too cartoony. My other will there be were one or two times where Bilbo as well as the dwarves fell from your height of like 500 feet and simply got back up. They would are already killed. I also thought the type Azog was fine, but why did he should be all CGI? Why couldn't it happen to be an actor in makeup like Lurtz in Fellowship with the Ring? Those are actually my only nitpicks though.
As I sat within the theater I had an atmosphere like this is one with the best filmgoing experiences I've ever had. I had the identical feeling watching Lord of the Rings. As someone who originally hated the idea of making this right into a trilogy, now I say take it on!!!
UPDATE: I got to determine the movie in 48 frames per second (HFR 3D) yesterday. I had only seen it in regular 24fps 3D before. 24fps has been the standard for film considering that the Silent movie days. The Hobbit will be the first movie being shot at 48fps take a sharper look. Unfortunately the technology is new so only some theaters are equipped to even show it at 48fps. Many from the reviewers were saying they hated it, it looks like a BBC TV movie. I was still curious so it can have a try since it is new technology and yes it's how Peter Jackson intended you to determine the movie, but I didn't wish it to distract from my first viewing if I wound up not liking it, therefore we saw the movie first at 24fps 3D.
Anyway, I liked it and I didn't think it looked "cheap" or being a "soap opera" at all. It looked really sharp and there were certain parts where the people appeared to be they were really right facing you. In addition to that, motion blur is totally gone now and I've been told by other people who get headaches from watching 3D movies that these were fine watching that one, thanks to the 48fps.
Peter Jackson has confirmed that there WILL be a prolonged edition dvd/blu ray like they did using the Lord of the Rings movies. So you may wish to hold out from buying the theatrical dvd when considering out and have the extended edition.
{[['
']]}
']]}
